United States v. Burston

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Burston

354 F. App'x 764

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 4, 2009·No. No. 09-7610·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Burston, Jr., appeals from a district court order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion for a writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the district court’s order and the record and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Burston, No. 5:04-cr-00371-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Burston, Jr., appeals from a district court order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion for a writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the district court’s order and the record and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Burston, No. 5:04-cr-00371-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Burston, 354 F. App'x 764 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

354 F. App'x 764 (United States v. Burston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.