United States v. Bursey

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 19, 2004
Docket03-51055
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Bursey (United States v. Bursey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bursey, (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 20, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-51055 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MAJOR DOYAL BURSEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A:03-CR-127-ALL-H --------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Major Doyal Bursey appeals his guilty-plea conviction

for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base.

He argues that the district court erred in denying his motion

to dismiss the indictment for violation of the Speedy Trial Act.

The Government contends that Bursey waived the Speedy Trial Act

issue by entering an unconditional guilty plea.

In this circuit, “a speedy trial violation is a

non-jurisdictional defect waived by a guilty plea.” United

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-51055 -2-

States v. Bell, 966 F.2d 914, 915 (5th Cir. 1992). By entering

an unconditional guilty plea, Bursey has waived his right to

appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the

indictment for violation of the Speedy Trial Act, and this court

may not consider the merits of his appeal. See id. at 916-17.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. James Clayton Bell
966 F.2d 914 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Bursey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bursey-ca5-2004.