United States v. Burress
This text of 487 F. App'x 82 (United States v. Burress) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Nathaniel Burress appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled “Petition for Redress of Grievance in Admiralty.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Burress, No. 5:04-cr-00031-FPS-JES-1, 2012 WL 2368985 (N.D.W.Va. June 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
487 F. App'x 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burress-ca4-2012.