United States v. Burrell Vann Moore, Sr.

986 F.2d 1416, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 9339, 1993 WL 50716
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 1993·No. 92-7239·Unpublished

Opinion

986 F.2d 1416

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Burrell Vann MOORE, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-7239.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 1, 1993
Decided: February 25, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CR-89-28-4-BO, CA-92-116-4-BO)

Burrell Vann Moore, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Burrell Vann Moore, Sr., appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Moore, Nos. CR-89-28-4-BO, CA-92-116-4BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Burrell Vann Moore, Sr., 986 F.2d 1416, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 9339, 1993 WL 50716 (4th Cir. 1993).

986 F.2d 1416 (United States v. Burrell Vann Moore, Sr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related