United States v. Burns

73 M.J. 260

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Burns. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 M.J. 407 →

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided March 13, 2014·No. No. 14-5004/AF·Published

Opinion

CCA S32084. Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals was filed under Rule 22 on this date on the following issue:

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (AFC-CA) ABUSED ITS DISCRETION AND COMMITTED A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE BY REACHING ITS ERRONEOUS FACTUAL INSUFFICIENCY CONCLUSION AND BY RELYING UPON FACTS NOT ESTABLISHED IN THE RECORD IN FINDING APPELLANT’S CONVICTION NOT FACTUALLY SUFFICIENT. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA S32084. Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals was filed under Rule 22 on this date on the following issue:

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (AFC-CA) ABUSED ITS DISCRETION AND COMMITTED A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE BY REACHING ITS ERRONEOUS FACTUAL INSUFFICIENCY CONCLUSION AND BY RELYING UPON FACTS NOT ESTABLISHED IN THE RECORD IN FINDING APPELLANT’S CONVICTION NOT FACTUALLY SUFFICIENT. •

United States v. Burns, 73 M.J. 260 (Ark. 2014).

Pincite

73 M.J. 260 (United States v. Burns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.