United States v. Burnett

Opinion

Case: 23-20518 Document: 39-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/25/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED

No. 23-20518 June 25, 2024 Summary Calendar

Lyle W. Cayce

____________

Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Donnies Burnett,

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21-CR-351-1

______________________________

Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Donnies Burnett has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Burnett has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Burnett’s claims of ineffective assistance of

_____________________

*

This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 23-20518 Document: 39-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/25/2024

No. 23-20518

counsel, but for his ineffectiveness claim related to the nature of the charge related to count two; we therefore decline to consider the remaining claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Corbett, 742 F.2d 173, 176-78 (5th Cir. 1984); see also United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Burnett’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.