United States v. Burleigh
This text of 73 M.J. 210 (United States v. Burleigh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CCA 37652. On consideration of the second motion for leave to withdraw filed by Captain Christopher James, USAF, [211]*211requesting to withdraw from representation as appellate defense counsel, and on consideration of Appellant’s letter of August 5, 2013, requesting to defend himself, and his subsequent refusals to cooperate with Captain James, it appears that Appellant no longer desires representation by any Air Force counsel and wishes to represent himself in this case. Accordingly, it is, ordered that said motion for leave to withdraw as appellate defense counsel is hereby granted. It is further ordered that Appellant has 30 days to submit matters to this Court, and that the supplement filed by Captain James with the Court on September 3, 2013, will not be considered by the Court unless Appellant specifically consents to its consideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 M.J. 210, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burleigh-armfor-2014.