United States v. Burks

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 28, 1998·No. 97-7404·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7404

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES K. BURKS, JR., a/k/a Howard Theodore Wright, a/k/a Marcus Williams, a/k/a Nathan King, a/k/a Derrick Baxter, a/k/a Marcus Allen, a/k/a Martin Wilson, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-460-A, CA-97-613-AM)

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 28, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lee Jenkins, Jr., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Gordon Dean Kromberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) motion. We have re-

viewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-

ity and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Burks, Nos. CR-93-460-A; CA-97-613-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 28,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Burks, (4th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Burks (United States v. Burks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related