United States v. Burgess Wholesale Mfg. Opticians, Inc.

24 B.R. 554, 50 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5733, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15269
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois
DecidedJune 1, 1982
Docket82 C 1507
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 24 B.R. 554 (United States v. Burgess Wholesale Mfg. Opticians, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Burgess Wholesale Mfg. Opticians, Inc., 24 B.R. 554, 50 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5733, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15269 (N.D. Ill. 1982).

Opinion

LEIGHTON, District Judge.

This cause is before the court on the appeal of the United States of America from the January 19, 1982 order, 16 B.R. 733, of the Bankruptcy Court overruling the government’s objection to the confirmation of a reorganization plan. The Government, a holder of a priority unsecured claim, objected because the plan did not provide for interest on the deferred payment of its allowed tax claims. The government contends that 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a), (c), payment by the debtor of post petition interest on a dischargeable, unsecured tax claim. The Bankruptcy Court, in a well-reasoned and thorough opinion, ruled that it did not. This court after reviewing the parties’ submissions and the relevant law agrees. 11 U.S.C. § 502(b)(2), expressly prohibits the allowance of claims for unmatured interest. The cases cited by the Government are in-apposite, as they deal with secured creditors under Chapter 13. Accordingly the ruling of the Bankruptcy Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 B.R. 554, 50 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5733, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burgess-wholesale-mfg-opticians-inc-ilnd-1982.