United States v. Burgess

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Burgess

610 F. App'x 307

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 28, 2015·No. No. 15-6585·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking an extension of time to file a Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Burgess’ informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court’s [308] disposition, Burgess has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking an extension of time to file a Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Burgess’ informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court’s [308] disposition, Burgess has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Burgess, 610 F. App'x 307 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

610 F. App'x 307 (United States v. Burgess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.