United States v. Burgess
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6572
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
YOLANDA VIOLA BURGESS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 06-6859
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:00-cr-00162-LMB-1) Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 27, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Yolanda Viola Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly A. Riley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Yolanda Viola Burgess appeals the district courts orders
denying relief on her writs of error coram nobis. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Burgess, No. 1:00-cr-00162-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 13, 2006; Apr. 19,
2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Burgess (United States v. Burgess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.