United States v. Bulmaro Moreno-Meraz

211 F. App'x 539
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 8, 2007
Docket06-1038
StatusUnpublished

This text of 211 F. App'x 539 (United States v. Bulmaro Moreno-Meraz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bulmaro Moreno-Meraz, 211 F. App'x 539 (8th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bulmaro Moreno-Meraz appeals the 108-month prison sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute approximately two pounds of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). On appeal, Moreno-Meraz argues that the district court erred in denying a minor-role reduction.

The district court did not clearly err in denying the minor-role reduction because Moreno-Meraz knowingly transported 848 grams of 97% pure methamphetamine to a cooperating individual, and he had made a drug delivery to the cooperating individual once before. See United States v. Bustos-Torres, 396 F.3d 935, 947-48 (8th Cir.) (district court’s factual determination of defendant’s role in offense may be reversed only if it is clearly erroneous, and it is defendant’s burden to prove role reduction is warranted), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1109, 125 S.Ct. 2557, 162 L.Ed.2d 284 (2005) and — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 203, 163 L.Ed.2d 179 (2005); United States v. Zuleta, 427 F.3d 1082, 1085-86 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (affirming denial of minor-role reduction where defendant acted as courier on more than one occasion).

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 F. App'x 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bulmaro-moreno-meraz-ca8-2007.