United States v. Bujese
This text of 405 F.2d 888 (United States v. Bujese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On June 7, 1967, this court affirmed Per Curiam a judgment convicting appellant of bank robbery in violation of 18 [889]*889U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) and of conspiring to rob a bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. United States v. Bujese, 378 F.2d 719 (2d Cir. 1967). Our decision was vacated by the Supreme Court, 392 U.S. 297, 88 S.Ct. 2064, 20 L.Ed.2d 1113 (6/10/68), and remanded for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), referring to Roberts v. Russell, 392 U.S. 293, 88 S.Ct. 1921, 20 L.Ed.2d 1100 (also 6/10/68).
Upon reconsideration we reverse the judgment of conviction and grant a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
405 F.2d 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bujese-ca2-1969.