United States v. Bujese

405 F.2d 888
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 3, 1969·No. No. 307, Docket 30574·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On June 7, 1967, this court affirmed Per Curiam a judgment convicting appellant of bank robbery in violation of 18 [889] U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) and of conspiring to rob a bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. United States v. Bujese, 378 F.2d 719 (2d Cir. 1967). Our decision was vacated by the Supreme Court, 392 U.S. 297, 88 S.Ct. 2064, 20 L.Ed.2d 1113 (6/10/68), and remanded for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), referring to Roberts v. Russell, 392 U.S. 293, 88 S.Ct. 1921, 20 L.Ed.2d 1100 (also 6/10/68).

Upon reconsideration we reverse the judgment of conviction and grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bujese, 405 F.2d 888 (2d Cir. 1969).

405 F.2d 888 (United States v. Bujese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

James Slawek v. United States
413 F.2d 957 (Eighth Circuit, 1969)