United States v. Buie

552 F. App'x 275
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 27, 2014
DocketNo. 13-6339
StatusPublished

This text of 552 F. App'x 275 (United States v. Buie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Buie, 552 F. App'x 275 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Ray Buie appeals the district court’s order granting the government’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion and reducing his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the Amended Judgment. See United States v. Davis, 679 F.3d 190, 197 (4th Cir.2012) (holding that district court may consider 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2012) factors “when deciding the extent of [a] sentence reduction after granting [a] Rule 35(b) motion.”). We deny Buie’s motion [276]*276for appointment of counsel, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Davis
679 F.3d 190 (Fourth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
552 F. App'x 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-buie-ca4-2014.