United States v. Buege

74 F.2d 1021, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3617
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 1935
DocketNo. 7567
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.2d 1021 (United States v. Buege) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Buege, 74 F.2d 1021, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3617 (9th Cir. 1935).

Opinion

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is an action upon a war risk insurance policy. The trial court erred in the ruling upon the admissibility of expert testimony upon the question of total and permanent disability. It is conceded on the argument that the rulings come squarely within our decision in United States v. Stephens, 73 F.(2d) 695, rendered November 13, 1934. See, also, recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in United States v. Spaulding, 55 S. Ct. 273, 79 L. Ed. —, decided January 7, 1935.

For this error the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Spaulding
293 U.S. 498 (Supreme Court, 1935)
United States v. Stephens
73 F.2d 695 (Ninth Circuit, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.2d 1021, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-buege-ca9-1935.