United States v. Buege

74 F.2d 1021, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3617
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 21, 1935·No. No. 7567·Published

Opinion

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is an action upon a war risk insurance policy. The trial court erred in the ruling upon the admissibility of expert testimony upon the question of total and permanent disability. It is conceded on the argument that the rulings come squarely within our decision in United States v. Stephens, 73 F.(2d) 695, rendered November 13, 1934. See, also, recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in United States v. Spaulding, 55 S. Ct. 273, 79 L. Ed. —, decided January 7, 1935.

For this error the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Buege, 74 F.2d 1021, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3617 (9th Cir. 1935).

74 F.2d 1021 (United States v. Buege) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Spaulding
293 U.S. 498 (Supreme Court, 1935)
United States v. Stephens
73 F.2d 695 (Ninth Circuit, 1934)