United States v. Buckman

Third Circuit

United States v. Buckman

194 F.2d 1009, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2891

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 14, 1952

Docket10557

StatusPublished

This text of 194 F.2d 1009 (United States v. Buckman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Buckman, 194 F.2d 1009, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2891 (3d Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted on two counts of a three count indictment for violation of the statute providing punishment for knowingly passing or concealing counterfeit money. 18 U.S.C. § 472(Supp.l951). There was adequate evidence to convict. We have fully examined the record. Our conclusion is that there were no errors of sufficient gravity to be the basis for upsetting the jury’s verdict and the judgment thereon.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted on two counts of a three count indictment for violation of the statute providing punishment for knowingly passing or concealing counterfeit money. 18 U.S.C. § 472(Supp.l951). There was adequate evidence to convict. We have fully examined the record. Our conclusion is that there were no errors of sufficient gravity to be the basis for upsetting the jury’s verdict and the judgment thereon.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 F.2d 1009, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-buckman-ca3-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack