United States v. Buckett

288 F. App'x 989
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 19, 2008
Docket07-40183
StatusUnpublished

This text of 288 F. App'x 989 (United States v. Buckett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Buckett, 288 F. App'x 989 (5th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Nicolas Buckett, proceeding pro se, appeals the 135-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He argues, for the first time on appeal, that his sentence is error because he should have received a safety-valve reduction, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. The Government moves for summary af-firmance or dismissal, urging that the appeal is barred by the waiver-of-appeal provision of Buckett’s plea agreement. Alternatively, the Government seeks an extension of time to file a merits brief.

Our review of the record shows that Buckett’s appeal waiver was knowing and voluntary and that, under the plain language of the plea agreement, the waiver applies to the circumstances at hand. See United States v. Burns, 433 F.3d 442, 445-46 (5th Cir.2005); United States v. McKinney, 406 F.3d 744, 746 (5th Cir.2005). Accordingly, Buckett’s appeal waiver bars review of the issue he seeks to raise on appeal.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the Government’s motions for dismissal or an extension of time are DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. McKinney
406 F.3d 744 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Creadell Burns
433 F.3d 442 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 F. App'x 989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-buckett-ca5-2008.