United States v. Bryson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Bryson

625 F. App'x 222

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2015·No. Nos. 15-6759, 15-6762·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for modification of the terms of his supervised release. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2) (2012), We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are' adequately presented in the [223] materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process..

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for modification of the terms of his supervised release. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2) (2012), We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are' adequately presented in the [223] materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process..

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bryson, 625 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

625 F. App'x 222 (United States v. Bryson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related