United States v. Bryson
This text of 625 F. App'x 222 (United States v. Bryson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for modification of the terms of his supervised release. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2) (2012), We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are' adequately presented in the [223]*223materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process..
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
625 F. App'x 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bryson-ca4-2015.