United States v. BRYANT
This text of United States v. BRYANT (United States v. BRYANT) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before DALY, HARRELL, and FLUHR Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Alexander C. BRYANT Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 202500354
Decided: 12 February 2026
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judges: Cory A. Carver (motions) Thomas R. Fricton (arraignment and trial)
Sentence adjudged 12 December 2024 by a special court-martial tried at Marine Corps Base Camp Butler, Okinawa, Japan, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduc- tion to E-1, confinement for 12 months, forfeiture of $1,344.00 pay per month for 12 months, and a bad-conduct discharge. 1
1 On 12 December 2024, the military judge announced the part of the sentence
extending to forfeiture of pay as $1,786.80 pay per month for 12 months. R. at 331. On 16 May 2025, the military judge held a post-trial Article 39(a), Uniform Code of Mili- tary Justice, proceeding in accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial 1104 to correct a computational error regarding Appellant’s adjudged forfeiture of pay and announced the corrected amount to be forfeited ($1,344.00 pay per month). R. at 352. United States v. Bryant, NMCCA No. 202500354 Opinion of the Court
For Appellant: Lieutenant Benjamin M. Cook, JAGC, USN
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings are correct in law, and the sen- tence is correct in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to Ap- pellant’s substantial rights occurred. 2 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court
2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. BRYANT, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bryant-nmcca-2026.