United States v. Bryant
This text of 95 F.2d 1019 (United States v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appearing that there was substantial evidence- that the veteran Ernest Floyd Hogan became permanently and totally disabled during the life of the war risk policy “sued on, and it further appearing that the question of whether he became totally and permanently disabled on July 15, 1919, or between that date and October 1, 1924, was not properly preserved [1020]*1020for review, either hy request for a specific finding or by exception or by an assignment of error, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 F.2d 1019, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bryant-ca6-1938.