United States v. Bryant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 3, 1996·No. 95-10742·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10742 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERIC BRYANT,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-005-A - - - - - - - - - - April 26, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eric Bryant argues that his right to due process was

violated by the district court’s refusal to grant his motion for

a downward departure. Because we lack jurisdiction to review the

district court’s exercise of its discretion in denying the motion

for a downward departure, unless the court’s refusal was the

result of a violation of law or a misapplication of the

Sentencing Guidelines, the appeal is DISMISSED. United States v.

DiMarco, 46 F.3d 476, 477 (5th Cir. 1995).

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bryant, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Bryant (United States v. Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Salvador Dimarco
46 F.3d 476 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)