United States v. Bryant

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bryant. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 F. App'x 573
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2004·No. 04-7157·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7157

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ISAIAH BRYANT, IV,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-01-236)

Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 22, 2004

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isaiah Bryant, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Isaiah Bryant, IV, appeals the district court’s order

denying his “Motion for Review and Clarification of the

Government’s Refusal to Make a Motion for Downward Departure.” We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Bryant, No. CR-01-236 (E.D. Va. May

12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bryant, (4th Cir. 2004).

United States v. Bryant (United States v. Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.