United States v. Brunson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Brunson

332 F. App'x 65

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Brunson. Read the opinion of the Court — 292 F. App'x 259 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 15, 2009·No. 09-6938·Unpublished

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joey Lamond Brunson appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2) (2006). We find no reversible error and we thus affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brunson, No. 5:04-cr-00307-SB-1 (D.S.C. May 5, 2009). We deny Brunson’s motion for summary disposition, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joey Lamond Brunson appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2) (2006). We find no reversible error and we thus affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brunson, No. 5:04-cr-00307-SB-1 (D.S.C. May 5, 2009). We deny Brunson’s motion for summary disposition, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Brunson, 332 F. App'x 65 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

332 F. App'x 65 (United States v. Brunson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related