United States v. Brumfield

325 F. App'x 460
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedMay 27, 2009
DocketNo. 06-3890
StatusPublished

This text of 325 F. App'x 460 (United States v. Brumfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Brumfield, 325 F. App'x 460 (7th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

Collins Brumfield pleaded guilty to distributing crack cocaine, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and was sentenced to the top of the guidelines range, 235 months’ imprisonment. Because his appeal was pending when the Supreme Court decided Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007), we remanded Brumfield’s sentence to the district court for the limited purpose of permitting the sentencing judge to advise this court whether he was inclined to resen-tence Brumfield in light of Kimbrough. However, we instructed the sentencing judge to hold off telling the court whether he was inclined to resentence the defendant under Kimbrough until he decided whether to act favorably on a motion to reduce the defendant’s sentence under the new guidelines range, U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(b)(2)(A).

Chief Judge Crabb, who is currently the only judge in the Western District of Wisconsin due to Judge' Shabaz’s medical leave, appropriately responded in place of Judge Shabaz. See United States v. Howe, 310 Fed.Appx. 43, 45 (7th Cir.2009) (unpublished order). Chief Judge Crabb [461]*461announced that she intends to lower Brumfield’s offense level to comport with the amended crack guidelines—Brum-field’s new guidelines range would be 151 to 188 months—and also that she is inclined to impose a yet lower sentence, pursuant to Kimbrough, based on the remaining disparity between the crack and powder cocaine sentencing guidelines. Brumfield requests a remand for resen-tencing; the government has not responded.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Brumfield’s sentence is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kimbrough v. United States
552 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court, 2007)
United States v. Howe
310 F. App'x 43 (Seventh Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
325 F. App'x 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brumfield-ca7-2009.