United States v. Bruce C. Fox

943 F.2d 1218, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 20117, 1991 WL 164741
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided August 29, 1991·No. 90-2048·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Defendant appealed the district court’s sentence following a guilty plea. By opinion filed April 18, 1991, 930 F.2d 820, this court affirmed defendant’s sentence in part but remanded the cause to the district court to clarify the reason for its refusal to depart downward from the Guidelines. The court now has for consideration the district court’s clarification dated August 13, 1991.

In view of the district court’s statement that it exercised discretion in denying a downward department, despite the Guideline authority for such departure, this court lacks jurisdiction to review that discretionary decision. See U.S. v. Soto, 918 F.2d 882, 883-84 (10th Cir.1990).

Therefore, in accordance with the court’s April 18, 1991, opinion and this order, the court affirms the sentence imposed by the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bruce C. Fox, 943 F.2d 1218, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 20117, 1991 WL 164741 (10th Cir. 1991).

943 F.2d 1218 (United States v. Bruce C. Fox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Carlos Jesus Garcia
42 F.3d 573 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Steve Rodriguez
30 F.3d 1318 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. David Clyde Starnes
7 F.3d 1046 (Tenth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Jesus Enrique Barrera-Barron
996 F.2d 244 (Tenth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Robert Sain McHenry
968 F.2d 1047 (Tenth Circuit, 1992)