United States v. Brown
This text of 179 F. Supp. 478 (United States v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court is unable to determine whether the defendant, Jessie C. Brown, was prejudiced in the trial of his case by the familiarity of juror No. 8, Atha N. Henson, with one of the witnesses for the defense, Mrs. Vina Smith, defendant’s mother. Because of the undisputed evidence adduced at the contempt hearing, as appears more particularly in the memorandum filed this day in United States v. Henson, D.C., 179 F.Supp. 474, that Mrs. Henson recognized Mrs. Smith when she took the witness stand and then failed to notify the Court, the Court finds it necessary, sua sponte, to grant a new trial.
Accordingly, it is by the Court this 15th day of December, 1959,
Ordered that the defendant be, and he hereby is granted a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 F. Supp. 478, 1959 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brown-dcd-1959.