United States v. Brown

179 F. Supp. 478, 1959 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2411
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided December 15, 1959·No. No. 769-59·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.

The Court is unable to determine whether the defendant, Jessie C. Brown, was prejudiced in the trial of his case by the familiarity of juror No. 8, Atha N. Henson, with one of the witnesses for the defense, Mrs. Vina Smith, defendant’s mother. Because of the undisputed evidence adduced at the contempt hearing, as appears more particularly in the memorandum filed this day in United States v. Henson, D.C., 179 F.Supp. 474, that Mrs. Henson recognized Mrs. Smith when she took the witness stand and then failed to notify the Court, the Court finds it necessary, sua sponte, to grant a new trial.

Accordingly, it is by the Court this 15th day of December, 1959,

Ordered that the defendant be, and he hereby is granted a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brown, 179 F. Supp. 478, 1959 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2411 (D.D.C. 1959).

179 F. Supp. 478 (United States v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Henson
179 F. Supp. 474 (District of Columbia, 1959)