United States v. Brown

22 C.M.A. 331
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided June 8, 1973·No. No. 26,155; No. 26,253; No. 26,319; No. 26,379; No. 26,391; No. 26,407; No. 26,587; No. 26,639; No. 26,827·Published

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Evidence of previous conviction by summary courts-martial resulting in a sentence to confinement was considered against the appellants on sentencing during trial or by the convening authority before his action in each of these cases. United States v Alderman, 22 USCMA 298, 46 CMR 298 (May 25, 1973) prohibits the use of such evidence. A fair risk exists that the evidence of such previous conviction was disadvantageous to each of the accused. Accordingly, we return the records of trial to the Judge Advocates General-of the respective services for submission to a Court of Military Review for further proceedings consistent with our disposition in United States v Aiderman, supra.

Chief Judge Darden dissents for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in United States v Alderman, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brown, 22 C.M.A. 331 (cma 1973).

22 C.M.A. 331 (United States v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.