United States v. Brown

24 F. Cas. 1247, 4 D.C. 607, 4 Cranch 607
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 F. Cas. 1247

Opinion

The Court

however,

(Thruston, J., dissenting,)

sustained the objection and rejected the witness; being of opinion that the execution of the sentence, without any provision by statute to that effect, did not restore his competency.

The prisoner was acquitted.

[608]*608The witness, Sandy Spriggs, was afterwards convicted of the same robbery, and sentenced to the penitentiary for four years only; he having probably prevented the other robbers from killing Milburne.

(See also the Maryland Act of 1793, c. 57, § 15, by which the service and labor, imposed as a punishment under that act, have the effect of a pardon ; from which special enactment it is to be inferred that without it, the punishment would not operate as a pardon.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brown, 24 F. Cas. 1247, 4 D.C. 607, 4 Cranch 607 (circtddc 1835).

24 F. Cas. 1247 (United States v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.