United States v. Brown

916 F.3d 706
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 2019
DocketNo. 18-1426; No. 18-1427
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 916 F.3d 706 (United States v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Brown, 916 F.3d 706 (8th Cir. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*707Anthony Brown appeals his sentence of 120 months' imprisonment for bank robbery. He challenges the district court's1 application of the crime of violence enhancement under the sentencing guidelines, contending that his Illinois attempted robbery conviction does not qualify as a career offender predicate under the guidelines's force clause. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1). "We review de novo the district court's determination that a conviction constitutes a crime of violence." United States v. Williams , 899 F.3d 659, 662 (8th Cir. 2018).

We recently held that Illinois robbery is a "violent felony" under the force clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act *708("ACCA"), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(b). Dembry v. United States , 914 F.3d 1185, 1187-88 (8th Cir. 2019). "The relevant definition of a violent felony under the ACCA and the definition of a crime of violence under the guidelines are so similar that we generally consider cases interpreting them interchangeably." United States v. Sykes , 914 F.3d 615, 620 (8th Cir. 2019) (internal quotation marks omitted). Applying this logic, we hold that Illinois robbery is a crime of violence under the guidelines. And because Illinois robbery is a crime of violence, so too is Illinois attempted robbery. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1) n.1 (noting that a "crime of violence" includes attempts to commit such an offense). This conclusion is consistent with Seventh Circuit decisions, which have "repeatedly held that Illinois robbery is a crime of violence under the 'force' clause of § 4B1.2(a)(1)." United States v. Davis , 712 F. App'x 578, 579 (7th Cir. 2018), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 2695, 201 L.Ed.2d 1085 (2018).

For these reasons, we affirm Brown's sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ricky Pulley
75 F.4th 929 (Eighth Circuit, 2023)
Conley v. United States
E.D. Missouri, 2022
United States v. Christopher Martin
999 F.3d 636 (Eighth Circuit, 2021)
United States v. Vasquez
N.D. Illinois, 2020
United States v. Darren Warren
951 F.3d 946 (Eighth Circuit, 2020)
Jackson v. United States
W.D. Missouri, 2019
United States v. Matthew Hataway
933 F.3d 940 (Eighth Circuit, 2019)
United States v. Eric Brown
Eighth Circuit, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
916 F.3d 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brown-ca8-2019.