United States v. Brown

145 F. App'x 48
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 305 F.3d 304
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 18, 2005·No. 04-30251·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Hannibal X. Brown has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Brown has filed a response and requested the appointment of substitute counsel.

Our independent review of the brief, Brown’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. *49 Brown’s motion to appoint substitute counsel is DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brown, 145 F. App'x 48 (5th Cir. 2005).

145 F. App'x 48 (United States v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)