United States v. Brown

86 F. App'x 779
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 250 F.3d 907
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 16, 2004·No. 03-10521·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

Cassius James Brown appeals the sentence he received in conjunction with his *780 guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of a substance containing cocaine. He asserts that the district court erred in sentencing him as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 because he had received misdemeanor sentences for his two state jail felony convictions pursuant to a Texas Penal Code provision. Because Brown’s guilty plea to a state jail felony exposed him to the possibility of a sentence of more than one year in prison, these convictions count as felonies under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 despite the fact that Brown received a misdemeanor sentence under Tex. Penal Code § 12.44(a). See United States v. Rivera-Perez, 322 F.3d 350, 352 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 2625, 156 L.Ed.2d 641 (2003). The judgment of the district court is thus AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *780 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brown, 86 F. App'x 779 (5th Cir. 2004).

86 F. App'x 779 (United States v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Rivera-Perez
322 F.3d 350 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)