United States v. Brown

119 F. App'x 514
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 F. App'x 23
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 13, 2005·No. 04-6831·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jay R. Brown appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to modify the terms of his supervised release. A district court’s imposition of special conditions of supervised release is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Dotson, 324 F.3d 256, 259 (4th Cir.2003). We have reviewed the record and find that the district court’s refusal to modify the terms of Brown’s supervised release was a proper exercise of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brown, 119 F. App'x 514 (4th Cir. 2005).

119 F. App'x 514 (United States v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Robert Morris Dotson, Jr.
324 F.3d 256 (Fourth Circuit, 2003)