United States v. Brown

53 F. App'x 273
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2002·No. No. 02-7223·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Juleen Brown appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to modify term of imprisonment and her request to allow her to resubmit her claim based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Brown, No. CR-96-108 (E.D.Va. July 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brown, 53 F. App'x 273 (4th Cir. 2002).

53 F. App'x 273 (United States v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)