United States v. Brown

6 F. App'x 164
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 23, 2001·No. 01-6132·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ernest Michael Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) and the order denying his motion to supplement the § 2255 motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Brown, Nos. CR-97-15-MJG; CA-00-2641-MJG (D.Md. Jan. 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brown, 6 F. App'x 164 (4th Cir. 2001).

6 F. App'x 164 (United States v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related