United States v. Brown, Anthony
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
April 5, 2006
Before
Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge
Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge
No. 04-1534 Appeal from the United States District Court for the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Northern District of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, Eastern Division.
v. No. 03 CR 886
ANTHONY BROWN, Suzanne B. Conlon, Defendant-Appellant. Judge.
ORDER
This court ordered a limited remand so the district court could state on the record whether the sentence remains appropriate now that United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), has limited the Sentencing Guidelines to advisory status. See United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005).
The district judge has now replied that she would have imposed a lower sentence rather than the 97-month sentence then mandated by the guidelines. The parties’ position statements in response to our invitation to comment on the district court’s Paladino response agree that resentencing is appropriate. Accordingly, pursuant to Paladino, we VACATE Brown’s sentence and REMAND to the district court for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Brown, Anthony (United States v. Brown, Anthony) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.