United States v. Broussard

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Broussard. Read the opinion of the Court — 80 F.3d 1025
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 30, 1998·No. 97-30898·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________

No. 97-30898 Summary Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

JOHN WESLEY BROUSSARD,

Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (96-CR-60041-1) _________________________________________________________________ March 27, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John Wesley Broussard appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea to transportation of hazardous waste to an

unpermitted facility, its transportation without a manifest, and

its storage without a permit. For the first time on appeal, he

challenges the district court’s upward departures, made pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 2Q1.2, application notes 5 and 7. Based on our review

of the record, we conclude that the district court did not commit

plain error in so departing. See, e.g., United States v. Ravitch,

128 F.3d 865, 869 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Vital, 68 F.3d

114, 119 (5th Cir. 1995).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Accordingly, Broussard’s sentence is

AFFIRMED.

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Broussard, (5th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Broussard (United States v. Broussard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Vital
68 F.3d 114 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Danielle Pauline Ravitch
128 F.3d 865 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)