United States v. Broome

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 28, 2025
Docket25-60058
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Broome (United States v. Broome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Broome, (5th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

Case: 25-60058 Document: 66-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/28/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 25-60058 FILED October 28, 2025 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Phillip Jason Broome,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:24-CR-73-1 ______________________________

Before Elrod, Chief Judge, and Smith, and Stewart, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Phillip Jason Broome appeals his sentence for his guilty-plea conviction of possession with intent to distribute a substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine. He contends that the district court did not address the mitigating evidence he submitted when imposing sentence.

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-60058 Document: 66-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/28/2025

No. 25-60058

The Government has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal based on Broome’s waiver of his right to appeal, which was included in his plea agreement and addressed by the district court when accepting his plea. Broome indicated that he understood and voluntarily agreed to the waiver provision when he signed the plea agreement and when he answered the district court’s questions at his plea hearing. Broome’s appeal waiver, which bars all challenges to his conviction and sentence except for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, is thus valid and enforceable. See United States v. Higgins, 739 F.3d 733, 736–37 (5th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, the Government’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Broome’s appeal is DISMISSED. The Government’s alternative motion for summary affirmance is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Richard Higgins
739 F.3d 733 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Broome, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-broome-ca5-2025.