United States v. Brooks

Opinion

Case: 23-10942 Document: 39-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/11/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-10942 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ April 11, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Kenshetha Brooks,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19-CR-175-1 ______________________________

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kenshetha Brooks has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Brooks has not filed a response. During the pendency of this appeal, Brooks completed the sentence

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-10942 Document: 39-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/11/2024

No. 23-10942

imposed on revocation of supervised release and was released from custody. Because she has not shown that she will suffer collateral consequences as a result of the revocation of her supervised release and because no additional term of supervised release was imposed, the instant appeal does not present a case or controversy, and this court lacks jurisdiction. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.