United States v. Brooks

126 F. App'x 202
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 22, 2005
Docket04-20916
StatusUnpublished

This text of 126 F. App'x 202 (United States v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Brooks, 126 F. App'x 202 (5th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Hogan Tebbs Brooks appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to review *203 or revoke an order of pretrial detention. We remanded the case to the district court for the limited purpose of rendering reasons for its denial. The district court issued an order setting forth its factual findings and its conclusion that Brooks should be detained because he is charged with a crime of violence and he poses both a flight risk and a danger to the community.

We review the order issued by the district court, not that of the magistrate judge. United, States v. Westbrook, 780 F.2d 1185, 1188 n. 4 (5th Cir.1986). Absent an error of law, this court will uphold a district court’s pretrial detention order if it is supported by the proceedings below. United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 585 (5th Cir.1992).

The district court’s ruling is supported by the record. See United States v. Hare, 873 F.2d 796, 798 (5th Cir.1989). The pretrial detention order is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Thomas Edward Westbrook
780 F.2d 1185 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)
United States v. William Bruce Hare
873 F.2d 796 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Mauricio Rueben and Gerardo Guerra
974 F.2d 580 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 F. App'x 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brooks-ca5-2005.