United States v. Brooks

124 F.3d 218, 1997 WL 589166
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Brooks. Read the opinion of the Court — 161 F.3d 1240
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided September 24, 1997·No. 96-1407·Unpublished

Opinion

124 F.3d 218

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Cedric Donnell BROOKS, also known as Scout, also known as
Adonis Bailey, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-1407.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 24, 1997.

Before TACHA, MCKAY and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Mr. Brooks' appeal is dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to United States v. Galloway, 56 F.3d 1239, 1240 (10th Cir.1995) (en banc).

DISMISSED.

*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brooks, 124 F.3d 218, 1997 WL 589166 (10th Cir. 1997).

124 F.3d 218 (United States v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. George Don Galloway
56 F.3d 1239 (Tenth Circuit, 1995)