United States v. Bronk

17 C.M.A. 293, 17 USCMA 293, 38 C.M.R. 91, 1967 CMA LEXIS 219, 1967 WL 4384
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided November 17, 1967·No. No. 20,533·Published

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

Tried by special court-martial, the accused pleaded guilty to two specifications of absence without leave and one of breach of restriction, in violation, respectively, of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Articles 86 and 134, 10 USC §§ 886, 934. Although the bad-conduct discharge was imposable solely because the offenses were tried together and the permitted confinement extended to- six months, the president did not state the basis for the additional penalty. Such was error and, under the circumstances of this case, it was prejudicial to fail to do so. United States v Yocom, 17 USCMA 270, 38 CMR 68, this day decided.

The' decision of the board of review is reversed and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. The board may reassess [294] the sentence appropriately or order a rehearing thereon.

Judge Kilday concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bronk, 17 C.M.A. 293, 17 USCMA 293, 38 C.M.R. 91, 1967 CMA LEXIS 219, 1967 WL 4384 (cma 1967).

17 C.M.A. 293 (United States v. Bronk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Blunk
17 C.M.A. 158 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1967)
United States v. Yocom
17 C.M.A. 270 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1967)