United States v. Brockman
This text of United States v. Brockman (United States v. Brockman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before HOLIFIELD, STEWART, and HACKEL Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Richard M. BROCKMAN Logistics Specialist First Class (E-6), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202200180
Decided: 28 October 2022
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Angela J. Tang
Sentence adjudged 22 April 2022 by a general court-martial convened at Naval Station Great Lakes, Illinois, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, con- finement for thirteen months, and a bad-conduct discharge. 1
For Appellant: Commander Kyle Calvin Kneese, JAGC, USN
1 The convening authority waived automatic forfeitures for a period of six months for the benefit of Appellant’s wife. United States v. Brockman, NMCCA No. 202200180 Opinion of the Court
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 2 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court
2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Brockman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brockman-nmcca-2022.