United States v. Brock

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Brock

261 F. App'x 530

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Brock. Read the opinion of the Court — 253 F. App'x 260 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 24, 2008·No. No. 07-7266·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lincoln Monroe Brock appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim. Pro. 33 motion for a new trial predicated on newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Brock’s motion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brock, No. 1:03-cr-00429-JAB (M.D.N.C., Aug. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Lincoln Monroe Brock appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim. Pro. 33 motion for a new trial predicated on newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Brock’s motion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brock, No. 1:03-cr-00429-JAB (M.D.N.C., Aug. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Brock, 261 F. App'x 530 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

261 F. App'x 530 (United States v. Brock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.