United States v. Broadie

D.C. Circuit

United States v. Broadie

215 F. App'x 7

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJanuary 26, 2007

DocketNo. 04-3174

StatusPublished

This text of 215 F. App'x 7 (United States v. Broadie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Broadie, 215 F. App'x 7 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the unopposed motion of appellant to issue judgment and mandate in which appellant advises the court that the district court would not alter the sentence previously imposed on appellant, and the court’s order filed July 7, 2007, affirming the judgment of conviction, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the sentence of the District Court appealed from in this cause be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the unopposed motion of appellant to issue judgment and mandate in which appellant advises the court that the district court would not alter the sentence previously imposed on appellant, and the court’s order filed July 7, 2007, affirming the judgment of conviction, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the sentence of the District Court appealed from in this cause be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 F. App'x 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-broadie-cadc-2007.