United States v. Broadie

D.C. Circuit

United States v. Broadie

215 F. App'x 7

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 26, 2007·No. No. 04-3174·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the unopposed motion of appellant to issue judgment and mandate in which appellant advises the court that the district court would not alter the sentence previously imposed on appellant, and the court’s order filed July 7, 2007, affirming the judgment of conviction, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the sentence of the District Court appealed from in this cause be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the unopposed motion of appellant to issue judgment and mandate in which appellant advises the court that the district court would not alter the sentence previously imposed on appellant, and the court’s order filed July 7, 2007, affirming the judgment of conviction, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the sentence of the District Court appealed from in this cause be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

United States v. Broadie, 215 F. App'x 7 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

Pincite

215 F. App'x 7 (United States v. Broadie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.