United States v. Bristow
269 F. App'x 655
Opinion
[656]*656MEMORANDUM
Kurtis Lee Bristow appeals from the district court’s revocation of his supervised release.
We dismiss in light of the fact that the appeal is moot. Bristow has completed all the terms of his sentence. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Bristow, 269 F. App'x 655 (9th Cir. 2008).
269 F. App'x 655 (United States v. Bristow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Joseph M. Palomba
182 F.3d 1121 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)