United States v. Brightwell

126 F. App'x 47
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJuly 28, 2004
DocketNo. 03-2001
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 126 F. App'x 47 (United States v. Brightwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Brightwell, 126 F. App'x 47 (3d Cir. 2004).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

This matter is before us on remand by the United States Supreme Court. This Court, by opinion filed July 28, 2004, affirmed the District Court’s judgment of conviction. On January 24, 2005, the Supreme Court granted the motion of Petitioner Richard Brightwell for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and granted the petition for writ of certiorari. The Court vacated the judgment of this Court and remanded the case for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

Upon further consideration as directed by the Supreme Court, we reaffirm all portions of our prior decision with respect to the conviction, including our conclusion that there was sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to convict. On the other hand, we will vacate that portion of our judgment that affirmed the judgment of sentence and remand to the District Court for resentencing in accordance with Booker.

For the foregoing reasons, we will affirm Brightwell’s conviction, vacate his sentence and remand to the District Court for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Brightwell
314 F. App'x 426 (Third Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 F. App'x 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brightwell-ca3-2004.