United States v. Bridges

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama

United States v. Bridges

24 F. Cas. 1230, 27 Pitts L.J. 152

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama·Decided October 15, 1879·Published

Opinion

BRUCE. District Judge,

in an oral opinion. commented upon the cases cited by defendant’s counsel, distinguishing them from the ease at bar. and overruling the motion for a new trial. He adhered to the former ruling, that where a defendant agrees to a sealed verdict, and the jury find him guilty, and deliver the verdict sealed to the clerk of the court and separate, the defendant has waived his right to have the jury polled when the verdict is read.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRUCE. District Judge,

in an oral opinion. commented upon the cases cited by defendant’s counsel, distinguishing them from the ease at bar. and overruling the motion for a new trial. He adhered to the former ruling, that where a defendant agrees to a sealed verdict, and the jury find him guilty, and deliver the verdict sealed to the clerk of the court and separate, the defendant has waived his right to have the jury polled when the verdict is read.

United States v. Bridges, 24 F. Cas. 1230, 27 Pitts L.J. 152 (circtndal 1879).

Pincite

24 F. Cas. 1230 (United States v. Bridges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.