United States v. Brian Rohrick
This text of 90 F. App'x 186 (United States v. Brian Rohrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Brian Rohrick appeals the district court’s 1 imposition of a 14-month prison term upon revocation of his supervised release for a felon-in-possession conviction. On appeal, he argues that the district court abused its discretion in imposing additional imprisonment and instead should have imposed inpatient drug treatment or *187 at least a sentence within the Guidelines suggested range.
After a careful review of the record, we find that the sentence was well below the maximum sentence allowed under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Jasper, 338 F.3d 865, 867 (8th Cir.2003); United States v. Rodriguez-Favela, 337 F.3d 1020, 1021 (8th Cir.2003). Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 F. App'x 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brian-rohrick-ca8-2004.