United States v. Brian Rohrick

90 F. App'x 186
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 2004
Docket03-2305
StatusUnpublished

This text of 90 F. App'x 186 (United States v. Brian Rohrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Brian Rohrick, 90 F. App'x 186 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brian Rohrick appeals the district court’s 1 imposition of a 14-month prison term upon revocation of his supervised release for a felon-in-possession conviction. On appeal, he argues that the district court abused its discretion in imposing additional imprisonment and instead should have imposed inpatient drug treatment or *187 at least a sentence within the Guidelines suggested range.

After a careful review of the record, we find that the sentence was well below the maximum sentence allowed under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Jasper, 338 F.3d 865, 867 (8th Cir.2003); United States v. Rodriguez-Favela, 337 F.3d 1020, 1021 (8th Cir.2003). Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Sebastian Rodriguez-Favela
337 F.3d 1020 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Conrad A. Jasper
338 F.3d 865 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 F. App'x 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brian-rohrick-ca8-2004.