United States v. Brian LeBeau
This text of United States v. Brian LeBeau (United States v. Brian LeBeau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 24-1215 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Brian LeBeau
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Western ____________
Submitted: June 18, 2024 Filed: June 24, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________
Before SMITH, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Brian LeBeau appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to 10 months in prison and an additional period of supervision. LeBeau challenges the substantive reasonableness of his sentence.
1 The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota. After careful review of the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the revocation sentence. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 917-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). There is no indication the district court failed to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir. 2006) (reciting considerations to discern whether revocation sentence is unreasonable); see also United States v. Bridges, 569 F.3d 374, 379 (8th Cir. 2009) (district courts have wide latitude to weigh the § 3553(a) factors in each case and are allowed to assign greater weight to some factors over others). Moreover, the revocation sentence is within the Guidelines range and accorded a presumption of substantive reasonableness on appeal. See United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008).
Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Brian LeBeau, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brian-lebeau-ca8-2024.