United States v. Brian Cossey
This text of 649 F. App'x 470 (United States v. Brian Cossey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Brian Paul Cossey appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges a special condition of supervised release imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.
*471 Cossey contends that the district court abused its discretion by imposing a condition of supervised release that prohibits him from acquiring, possessing, or viewing materials that depict “sexually explicit conduct,” as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2256(2)(A), and deemed inappropriate by Cossey’s probation officer and sex offender treatment provider. We have approved a number of conditions related to sex offenders. However, consistent with our sister circuits, we recently held that a condition that extends to non-pornographic materials involving adults deprives a defendant of more liberty than is reasonably necessary. See United States v. Gnirke, 775 F.3d 1155, 1165-66 (9th Cir.2015). We, therefore, vacate the condition as written and remand for the district court to reimpose the condition consistent with Gnirke. See id. at 1166.
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
649 F. App'x 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brian-cossey-ca9-2016.